Legal Opinion

Forster v. Orr

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appear from a judgment of the Circuit Court for the county of Polk.

1Opinion of the CourtThayer, C. J.

The respondents commenced an action in the said circuit court against the appellant for a malicious arrest. He alleged in his complaint, in substance, that on the second day of October, 1888, in a civil action begun by appellant against respondent in said circuit court, appellant, in order to procure the arrest and imprisonment of respondent, falsely and maliciously, and without any reasonable or probable cause therefor, duly made and filed his affidavit, duly verified by him, together with the undertaking required by law, in which affidavit he falsely and fraudulently, and without probable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Searll v. McCrackenNew York Supreme Court · 1858
  2. State v. So Ho GeWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gowin v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Mitchell v. Silver Lake LodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gumm v. HeiderOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. American Motors Finance Co. v. ClecklerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Neimitz v. ConradOregon Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API