Neimitz v. Conrad
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah county: E. D. Shattuck, Judge. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
This is an action for false imprisonment, brought here by plaintiff on appeal from a nonsuit entered against him in the court below. The record is in confusion, but from the bill of exceptions, interpreted in the light of the briefs and arguments of counsel, the facts appear to be that on August 22, 1891, defendants Conrad and Schafer commenced an action in a justice’s court against plaintiff, on an account; and at the same time filed an affidavit and undertaking in due form for the arrest of plaintiff as an absconding debtor. A warrant of arrest was issued by the justice of the peace and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Day v. . BachNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Ocean Steamship Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Roth v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Forster v. OrrOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Matoon v. EderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hiber v. Creditors Collection Service of Lincoln County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Mahon v. RankinOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Robberson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Gearity v. StrasbourgerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Williams v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.