Legal Opinion

Searll v. McCracken

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1858PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer to complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Clerke, Justice.

The complaint does not state that the order of arrest which it alleges the defendant maliciously and falsely obtained against the plaintiff in another action, had been vacated, or that judgment had been rendered for the defendant therein. If the order was a nullity ah initio, and Could afford no justification, these allegations would be unnecessary. But the order set forth in this complaint is clearly not void. If at all defective, and issued on a false affidavit, it is only voidable; and this must be determined by the competent authority, before an action can be sustained…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Forster v. OrrOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Moulton v. BeecherNew York Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Francisco v. Little Falls Dairy Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API