Hayden v. Medcenter One, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Arthur and Joy Lynn Hayden, in them individual capacities and as co-conservators and co-guardians of Todd Hayden, and the law firm of Smith Bakke Porsborg Schweigert & Armstrong (“law firm”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their claims against Medcenter One, Inc., and other medical providers for expenses and attorney fees incurred in securing payments from Todd Hayden’s medical insurance company for his medical expenses. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in ruling as a matter of law that the medical providers are not liable to the Haydens…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bashara v. Baptist Memorial Hospital SystemTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- In Re Guardianship of BloomquistNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Bishop v. BurgardIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- City and County of San Francisco v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- McColl Farms, LLC v. PflaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Thimjon Farms Partnership v. First International Bank & TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Northstar Founders, LLC v. Hayden Capital USA, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- Larson v. Midland Hospital Supply, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.