State v. . Vicks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtScheNCK, J.
The appellant reserved exception, and sets out the same in his brief, to an excerpt from the charge of the court as follows: “But if the State has, by evidence, satisfied the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that this defendant had carnal knowledge or sexual intercourse, the two terms being synonymous, with the prosecutrix, and that he accomplished it by force and violence, and against her will, it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty of rape, as charged in the bill of indictment. If the evidence of the State fails to so satisfy you then you need not find him guilty of rape, and it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . UtleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . GrassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. TilleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. PeacockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. MoreheadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.