Legal Opinion
Hlinko v. Marlow
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 16, 2007No. 45A03-0607-CV-313PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.
Defendant-Appellant Marie Hlinko appeals the denial of her motion to correct error, which sought to set aside the trial court’s denial of her “Motion to Continue Trial or in the Alternative to Bar Testimony and Exhibits.”
We affirm.
The sole restated issue is whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Hlinko’s motion to continue the trial and by denying her motion to correct error.
In 2002, Yvonne M. Marlow (Yvonne) was involved in an automobile accident with Hlinko. Based upon this accident, Yvonne and her husband, John E. Marlow (collectively the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Troxel v. TroxelIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Nance v. Miami Sand & Gravel, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Everage v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Principal Life Insurance Co. v. NeedlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Pfaffenberger v. Jackson County Regional Sewer DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- AGS Capital Corp. v. Product Action International, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Dennerline v. AtterholtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. C & J Real Estate, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Herdt v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- May v. GeorgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.