Legal Opinion

Troxel v. Troxel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 2000No. 71S04-0008-CV-480PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that where a probate court erroneously admits a will to probate after the expiration of the statute of limitations, the court’s subsequent orders are voidable and subject to attack via a timely will contest, but are not void. Accordingly, any interested party with notice of the belated effort to probate the will must object within the five-month period for a will contest.

Factual and Procedural Background

Jack Troxel and his second wife, Joanne, lived in a home on a twenty-four acre parcel of property in rural St. Joseph County. After their…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Shell Oil Co. v. Lovold Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Stidham v. WhelchelIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Kenworthy v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. K.S. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bunch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. City of Gary v. MajorIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Olcott International & Co. v. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API