Legal Opinion
Sapp v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 2010No. ED 93728PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., Judge.
Phillip Sapp (“Sapp”) appeals from the judgment of the circuit court dismissing his petition for administrative review for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We reverse and remand.
Sapp was employed by the Division of Corrections for the City of St. Louis (“the City”) as a Corrections Officer II. On December 5, 2007, Sapp reported an inmate count of seventy-nine, and it was subsequently determined that there were eighty inmates in Sapp’s assigned housing unit. As a result of Sapp’s actions, there was a recount, and Sapp admitted he did not physically conduct a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- City of Valley Park v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- William Smith v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Arnold Shute v. Board of Zoning Adjustments of Franklin County, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Elizabeth Smith v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021
- New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility v. City of St. Peters, MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025