Legal Opinion

McCracken v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 27, 2009No. SC90050PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

The circuit court dismissed J. Michael McCracken’s negligence claim against Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the claim because Mr. McCracken is a statute- ry employee of Wal-Mart under section 287.040.1 of the Workers’ Compensation Law (“the Act”). 1 As a result, the court held, exclusive jurisdiction of his claim is vested in the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.

This Court reverses and remands. Mr. McCracken’s action is a civil case sounding in negligence. As such, the circuit court has subject matter…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. J.C.W. Ex Rel. Webb v. WyciskallaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. Missouri Soybean Ass'n v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  3. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  4. Bass v. National Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Kemper v. GluckSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. PalmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Knudson v. Systems Painters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Curt Peters and Cheri Peters v. Wady Industries, Inc., and Patrick TerrioSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. Hightower v. MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API