Legal Opinion
City of Valley Park v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided January 13, 2009No. SC 89186PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Overview
PER CURIAM. 1
In 2004, Valley Park wanted to annex Peerless Park. It submitted a proposal to do so to the St. Louis County boundary commission. After a public hearing on the proposal, Valley Park submitted an amended proposal. The boundary commission rejected the amended proposal. Valley Park successfully sought judicial review. The circuit court determined that the boundary commission’s action was arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable. As a result, the circuit court remanded the annexation proposal to the boundary commission for referral to the county board of election commissioners…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Phipps v. School District of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- City of Cabool v. Missouri State Board of MediationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Cade v. State, Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- David Zink v. George LombardiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Harold Lampley and Rene Frost v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Alisa WarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- State ex rel. Robison v. Lindley-MyersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018
- School District of Kansas City v. Missouri Board of Fund CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ard v. Shannon County CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.