Legal Opinion
Amanda Crosby, Administratrix for the Estate of Billy K. Allred v. Rohm & Haas Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2007No. 06-5347PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTON, Circuit Judge.
Amanda Crosby filed this lawsuit against Rohm and Haas under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., seeking to recover benefits allegedly owed to her as a beneficiary of her father’s life insurance policy with the company. She also sought monetary penalties from the company because it allegedly violated ERISA’s disclosure requirements. The district court granted summary judgment for Rohm and Haas, reasoning that Crosby received all of the life insurance benefits she was due and that the company’s conduct did not warrant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Robert L. Musto v. American General CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Virginia Armistead, Cross-Appellants v. Vernitron Corporation Aie--Division of Vernitron Group Insurance Plan, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp. LLC Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Bloemker v. Laborers' Local 265 Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Harper v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Deschamps v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. Salaried Employees Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Zirnhelt v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.