Legal Opinion

Neal v. Neal

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1958No. 5589_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

250 F.2d 885

Leo Alan NEAL III, an infant by Kathryn Miller, his mother

and his guardian; Kathryn Neal Miller, an individual; and

Kathryn Neal Miller (same person as Kathryn Miller),

Administratrix of the Estate of Leo Alan Neal II, deceased, Appellants,

v.

Frank Parkinson NEAL, as the Executor of the Estate of Helen

Parkinson Neal, deceased; The Parkinson-Neal Motor Company,

now known as the Day-Neal Motor Company, a partnership; The

Alan Investment Company, a partnership; The Neal Farm

Equipment Company, a partnership; The Foster Ranch, a

partnership; Frank Parkinson Neal, individually; Frank

Parkinson…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Ashbauth v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Watson v. American Creosote Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Wells v. HelmsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  5. Seran v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API