Legal Opinion

Annett v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Corey Annett and his parents (collectively Annetts) appeal from an order reinstating an order dismissing their case, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution under SDCL 15-11-11. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2] On March 28,1990, Corey Annett was seriously injured while operating a Honda 350X all terrain vehicle (ATV). This ATV was designed by Honda R & D Co., Ltd (Honda R & D), distributed by American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (American Honda), and sold as a used vehicle by Stich’s of Watertown d/b/a Sheehan Cycle (Sheehan Cycle).

[¶ 3] On April 24, 1992, Annetts filed a summons…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dakota Cheese, Inc. v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Duncan v. Pennington County Housing AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. FMC Corp. v. ChatmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Holmoe v. ReussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nielsen v. McCabeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Devitt v. HayesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. London v. AdamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Jenco, Inc. v. United Fire GroupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Simpson v. C & R SUPPLY, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API