Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Pennington County Housing Authority

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1986No. 14937PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

ACTION

This is an appeal from a Judgment which dismissed a Third-Party Complaint with prejudice, for failure to prosecute. The propriety of the dismissal for failure to prosecute is the sole issue presented. We affirm.

FACTS

On January 9, 1975, Coyle W. Duncan (Duncan) was injured while working at a construction site in Rapid City, South Dakota. In August 1975, Duncan filed suit against the Pennington County Housing Authority; Aukerman and Mazourek, Inc., a Rapid City architectural firm; and nine employees of the construction site’s general contractor, Dan J. Brutger, Inc.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Duncan v. Pennington County Housing AuthoritySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Chicago and North Western Railway Co. v. BradburySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ayers v. D. F. Quillen & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Opp v. NieuwsmaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Dakota Cheese, Inc. v. TaylorSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Holmoe v. ReussSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Horne v. CrozierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API