Legal Opinion

London v. Adams

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1998No. NonePublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Bonnie London sued Clarence M. Adams for damages arising out of a car accident between the two parties. After a substantial period of inactivity, London’s new counsel moved for a default judgment and Harmon moved for dismissal for lack of prosecution. Both motions were withdrawn by agreement when it was learned that Adams had died prior to the filing of the motion. After subsequent, extensive file activity, London’s case was conditionally dismissed for lack of prosecution. The trial court conditioned the dismissal on payment of partial attorney fees to MeCahren…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Root v. BinghamSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Reuben C. Setliff, III, M.D., P.C. v. StewartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Simpson v. C & R SUPPLY, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Swenson v. Sanborn County Farmers Union Oil Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Eischen v. Wayne TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API