Legal Opinion
Little v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 4, 1999No. CIV. 98-74748PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daryl Little’s civil complaint for return of property is now before this Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The case has been remanded for this Court’s decision as to whether the doctrine of laches bars Plaintiffs claim, insofar as he seeks the return of two automobiles that were seized by the federal government in February of 1991.
I
In May 1992, Plaintiff was convicted on drug and firearm charges and of leadership of a conspiracy to distribute cocaine and cocaine base. On April 1,1996,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nicholas M. Patton v. Richard Bearden, Robert Bearden, and J.M. Bearden, Individually, and D/B/A Bearden Fish FarmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Complaint v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc., and Robert L. Hess, Cross-Complainant/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Moore v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDaniel v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2000