Legal Opinion
McDaniel v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 3, 2000No. 6:00-645-20Published
1Opinion of the Court
*680ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ (collectively “government”) motion for summary judgment. Terrance McDaniel (“McDaniel”) opposes the motion. For the reasons below, the court grants the government’s motion for summary judgment.
I. Statement op the Facts
On February 16, 1993, police obtained written consent from McDaniel and three other criminal suspects to search their rooms at a Comfort Inn and to search a rental ear being used by McDaniel and one of the other suspects. The officers found crack cocaine in the trunk of the rental car and in a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Robinson v. HanrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Shaun K. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.