Legal Opinion

Haney v. Cribbs

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 2006No. Nos. 05-279, 06-69PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] In these consolidated appeals, we consider Appellants’, RaNaye Haney and Duane Haney (the Haneys), contention that the district court erred in dismissing their personal injury complaint against Appellees, Steven D. Cribbs1 and DRM, Inc. (collectively DRM), for the reason that the Haneys served it on the Wyoming Attorney General and the Director of the Wyoming Department of Employment by regular U.S. Mail, rather than by certified mail return receipt requested. This case is docketed as Case No. 05-279.

[¶ 2] The district court’s order dismissing the Haneys’ case, followed by…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rosa v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  2. Bell v. SchellWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Wooster v. Carbon County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hoke v. Motel 6 JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Clause v. Columbia Savings & Loan Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Marriage of Cyr and KayColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Mabe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hall v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Hall v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API