Legal Opinion

Hoke v. Motel 6 Jackson

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2006No. 05-132PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Paula Hoke (Hoke) allegedly suffered injuries on March 6, 2000, while a guest at Motel 6 of Jackson, Wyoming (Motel 6). On March 4, 2004, two days before the statute of limitations expired, Hoke filed a negligence action against Motel 6 and Accor North America, Inc. (Accor). After vacating a default judgment, the district court dismissed with prejudice the claims against Motel 6 on the grounds that the service of summons and complaint was improper pursuant to W.R.C.P. 4(b) and the statute of limitations had passed. The court also dismissed the claims against Accor…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Gaines v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. McGuire v. McGuireWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Parker v. MackNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Vanasse v. RamsayWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rosty v. SkajWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  2. William C. Forbes and Julia Forbes, Trustees of the Beckton Ranch Trust U/A/D April 1, 1920Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Inman v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Paul A. Woodie and Kimberly A. Woodie A/K/A Kymberly A. Woodie A/K/A Kym Woodie, Husband and Wife v. Janet WhitesellWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Courtney C. BoutelleWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API