Mabe v. State

BURKE, Justice.

[¶1] William Mabe appeals his conviction on a felony charge of larceny by bailee. He asserts that the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted into evidence certain documents that contained handwriting from an unidentified person. We conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error, and we affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] Mr. Mabe's single issue, slightly rephrased, is whether the trial court erred when it admitted exhibits that contained unidentified handwriting.

FACTS

[¶3] In August 2005, Mr. Mabe went to work for Kosma Heating and Air Conditioning as a fabricator and…