Legal Opinion
Dept. of Agriculture v. Tide Oil Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 24, 1969No. Civ. 32003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
We are dealing here with four sets of defendants: Tide Oil Company and A. W. Hane; Philsam Petroleum, Inc., doing business as Jimmy’s Service Stations; Harry Kelber; and a group of defendants collectively designated as the ‘ ‘ Lippman defendants. ’ ’
This is a suit for injunctive relief commenced pursuant to section 20982 of the Business and Professions Code. Plaintiff is the Department of Agriculture of the State of California, acting through the Division of Weights and Measures. Defendants are owners and operators of retail motor vehicle fuel service stations at which gasoline is advertised,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Sperry & Hutchinson Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Board of Education v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Merit Oil Co. v. Director of the Division on the Necessaries of LifeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lavie v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Midpeninsula Citizens for Fair Housing v. Westwood InvestorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. Overstock.com, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.