Legal Opinion

Poole v. Hudson

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided August 13, 1951No. Civil Action No. 58PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Caret, Judge:

The question for decision is whether the defendant’s affidavit “shows on its face a condition of facts which, if true, would constitute a legal defense” to plaintiff’s scire facias action. 1 Woolley Delaware Practice 197. More specifically, is it a complete defense in this case to show that Mrs. Hudson was “under the influence of opiates and did not know the nature and character of the papers she signed”?

The affidavit suggests, hut does not expressly aver, mental incapacity at the time of the transaction. It was held in Delaware, at a very early date, that drunkenness, even…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sutcliffe v. HeatleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Flach v. Gottschalk Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
  3. Poole v. Newark Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1939
  4. Warwick v. AddicksSuperior Court of Delaware · 1931
  5. Industrial Trust Co. v. MillerSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. Clearance Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  2. G. A. S. v. S. I. S.Delaware Family Court · 1978
  3. Adams v. CLEARANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1955
  4. Capano, Gerard J. v. Capano, Louis J., Jr.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
  5. G. A. S. v. S. I. S.Delaware Family Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API