Legal Opinion
Poole v. Newark Trust Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided July 28, 1939No. 216PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Rodney, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
In the determination of the present matter three major questions arise:(1) Was there such a legal adjudication of the insanity of Howard Malcolm Armstrong by the appointment of a Trustee by the Chancellor that notice will be imputed therefrom and vitiate any transaction of Armstrong’s after said appointment?
*169(2) Was there actual notice to the bank of said appointment ?(3) The effect of the payment of the check by the bank in the absence of either imputed or actual notice of the appointment of the Trustee.
The plaintiff strongly relies upon the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- American Trust & Banking Co. v. BooneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Black v. Bank of WestminsterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
- Dewey v. AllgireNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Mayor of New York v. Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Reed v. Mattapan Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Nos. 500, 502 & 504 King Street, & Nos. 503, 505 & 507 French Street, Commercial Trust Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1970
- State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources & Environmental Control v. PhillipsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1979
- In Re BohnstedtCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- Poole v. HudsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.