Legal Opinion

Bigsby v. Eppstein

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 14, 1913No. 2942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Action by L. Eppstein- and another, copartners, against P. H. Bigsby and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants petition for a new trial. Petition denied, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

On February 11, 1910, upon issues joined by answer, a judgment was duly rendered against all of the defendants now appearing here as plaintiffs in error, the cause standing for trial on that date by regular assignment on the calendar. Neither of the defendants was present. On February 14, 1910, a motion for new trial was filed in behalf of defendants Bigsby and Lanthripe, the motion being signed by E. G. Pitman and S. P. Freeling as their attorneys. On March 17, 1910, this motion, coming on regularly for hearing, was overruled; no exceptions being shown in the record. On…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rogers v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Coonan v. LoewenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  4. Burkett v. Lehmen-Higginson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. Price v. CarneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Pulaski Oil Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Lindsey v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Boulter v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API