Legal Opinion

Isom v. Dubbs

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 6, 1928No. 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents in an interference proceeding, in which priority of invention was awarded Dubbs, the senior party.

The counts are two in number, and read as follows:

“1. In a device of the class described, a furnace having heating flues therein, substantially vertical heating pipes extending through said heating flues, a supply tank, a connection from said heating pipes to said tank, a liquid forcing means, and connections from said tank and heating pipes to said means.
“2. An apparatus for cracking hydrocarbons, comprising a tank…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harvey v. ShortCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1938
  2. Schweyer v. ThomasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. In re RogoffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API