Legal Opinion

Bradford v. Hurt

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 24, 1936No. 8108PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The appeal is from an order refusing an interlocutory injunction. Ordinarily on such an appeal the only question for consideration is whether discretion has been abused. Rogers v. Hill, 289 U.S. 582, 53 S.Ct. 731, 77 L.Ed. 1385, 88 A.L.R. 744; Alabama v. U. S., 279 U.S. 229, 231, 49 S.Ct. 266, 73 L.Ed. 675; Butler v. D. A. Schulte, Inc. (C.C.A.) 67 F.(2d) 632; Douglass v. Pan-American Bus Lines (C.C.A.) 81 F.(2d) 222; Griswold v. President of United States (C.C.A.) 82 F.(2d) 922. Sometimes, however, the bill so plainly fails to state a case for the equitable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Spielman Motor Sales Co. v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Meccano, Ltd. v. John Wanamaker, NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bayer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Reed v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  3. Baltimore & OR Co. v. Board of Public WorksDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1936
  4. Carolina-Virginia Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. CahoonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
  5. Farr v. O'KEEFEDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API