Legal Opinion

Cass County State's Attorney v. O.H.W.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 2009No. 20090136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] O.H.W. appeals the district court order finding he remains a sexually dangerous individual and denying his petition for discharge from the North Dakota State Hospital. We affirm, concluding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the State’s expert opinion testimony and that the district court’s denial of O.H.W.’s petition for discharge was supported by clear and convincing evidence and was not induced by an erroneous view of the law.

*75I

[¶ 2] O.H.W. was committed to the North Dakota State Hospital as a sexually dangerous individual in 2005. His…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Anderson v. A.P.I. Co. of MinnesotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Nesvig v. NesvigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Weber v. WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Westby v. SchmidtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. CampbellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Wamstad v. LoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. In Re OHWNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wamstad v. LoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API