Legal Opinion
Manica v. Smith
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 25, 1934No. Civ. No. 4619PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A rehearing was granted in this case to give further consideration to the question regarding the statutory liability. of the owner of an automobile who, for hire, permits it to be used and operated by another person through whose gross negligence a guest is injured.
The appellant was engaged at Sacramento in the business of renting automobiles to be operated by other persons. The company owned the machine which is involved in this appeal. For a consideration it was rented to and operated by the defendant Smith on April 28, 1930. The plaintiff was riding in the machine as a guest at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. NowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Criss v. Angelus Hospital Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Horning v. GerlachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kile v. KileSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Moyer v. DreschCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.