Legal Opinion
Moyer v. Dresch
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1934No. Civ. 1511PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial where the case was tried before a jury as a matter of right. The order specified that the motion was “granted upon the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict”.
Defendants are husband and wife. Plaintiff is the brother of Florence Dresch and brother-in-law of Theodore Dresch. On June 19, 1932, the three were traveling from Los Angeles to Lake Elsinore in an automobile owned by defendants and driven by Mrs. Dresch. Mr. Dresch sat on the front seat of the ear at the driver’s right and plaintiff occupied the rear seat…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Green v. SouleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bates v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Smith v. RoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Fisher v. ZimmermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. NavarroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- People v. BacosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.