Legal Opinion
Daniel Bell v. State of Oregon; Oregon State Corrections; Oregon Department of Corrections
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 22, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00566Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON DANIEL BELL, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00566-JR Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE OF OREGON; OREGON STATE CORRECTIONS; and OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants. Adrienne Nelson, District Judge: On April 8, 2025, plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint, an application for leave to proceed without paying fees (i.e., in forma pauperis or “IFP”), and supporting documents. See ECFs 1, 2, 3, 4. On June 2, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Jolie A. Russo (1) granted plaintiff’s IFP application, Order of June 2, 2025, ECF 44…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lance Ian Osband v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cpc Patent Techs. Pty Ltd. v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- THUNDERBIRD HOTELS, LLC v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2009