Legal Opinion

Bjork v. Peters

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 3, 2020No. 6:19-cv-00981Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION CRAIG BJORK, Case No. 6:19-cv-00981 OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, vs. COLETTE PETERS, et al., Defendants. AIKEN, District Judge: Before the Court are pro se plaintiff Craig Bjork’s Objection (doc. 21), Request Review of Objection (doc. 43), and Motion for Decision (doc. 48), which challenge Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Order (doc. 19) denying plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (doc. 16) and plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (doc. 2). In the interest of justice, I construe…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API