Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Schwartz
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1960No. 8761PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The facts in this case are that the defendant, Herbert T. Schwartz, and Dora Zaslavsky were married about 1926 in New York City; that later on they agreed upon a divorce; that in New York state adultery is the only ground of divorce; that about 1934 they therefore arranged for, and staged a fraudulent act of adultery, at which the said defendant, Herbert T. Schwartz, was not even present. The defendant, in Ms deposition, elaborates on this situation as follows:
“Q. Well, what arrangements did you make with Dora on' your return from Ann Arbor? A. Well, we agreed to separate and get that divorce…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Stewart v. EatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Howland v. StitzerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Smith v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DocRx, Inc. v. Emi Services of North Carolina, LLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Nader v. SERODYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Anderson v. AndersonConnecticut Superior Court · 1967