Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Eaton
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1939No. Docket No. 88, Calendar No. 40,205PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
This is an action in assumpsit brought by plaintiff against defendant to recover the balance claimed to be due upon a promissory note. The note sued upon was, when given, secured by a mortgage on Chicago real estate. The mortgage securing the note was foreclosed in chancery in Illinois and the mortgaged property sold to satisfy the mortgage. There was no personal service of process upon defendant in the Illinois suit to foreclose the mortgage. There was substituted service upon defendant by an order of publication made by the Illinois court and duly published. The mortgaged property sold in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. BaerMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- North Branch Products, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, of Millington, Michigan v. W. Reuen Fisher, Village of Entrance, Alberta, CanadaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- McRary v. . McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Benadon v. AntonioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.