Legal Opinion
Smith v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 6, 1943No. 6243PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By MATTHEWS, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County. That court found that neither party was in a position to invoke relief and, therefore, refused to make any declaration concerning or disturb in any way, the situation in which the parties had placed themselves. The opinion of the court is reported in 23 OO 283, and 44 N. E. (2d) (9 Ohio Supp. 49). Both parties were dissatisfied with that hands-off attitude and have appealed to this court.
The record discloses that the defendant Ruth Kuh Smith (nee Rosenthal) was married to one Julius…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Krause v. KrauseNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Starbuck v. . StarbuckNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cross v. CrossArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re Anderson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- Judkins v. JudkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Cook v. CookSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
- State v. NajjarNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.