Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. American Ice Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1962No. Appeal, 14PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The basic and only question to be decided in this appeal may be stated as follows: Is the production of ice by artificial methods for commercial purposes to be regarded as “manufacturing”? What is the difference, so far as the process of freezing is concerned, between placing a glass of water on an outer window sill (in January with the temperature under 32 degrees) and pouring water into vats where it is treated by chemicals and machinery so that it is transformed into shiny frozen blocks?

The parties involved in this appeal seek an answer to this question not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
  3. Armour and Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Commonwealth v. Weiland Packing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission v. St. Joe Minerals Corp., Zinc Smelting DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. Harmar Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. Berlo Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Lookenbill v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Western Pennsylvania Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API