Legal Opinion

State v. Filler

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1995No. 2442-MPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reece, Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, city of Medina, appeals the decision of the Medina Municipal Court granting defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence obtained by Medina Township and city of Medina police officers. We reverse and remand.

On April 23, 1994, two Medina Township officers observed defendant-appellee, Samuel S. Filler, operating a motor vehicle within the city of Medina in an erratic manner, committing numerous traffic violations. Specifically, Filler’s vehicle failed to yield to the township cruiser’s right of way, and the township officers observed Filler weaving, driving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Stow v. RiggenbachOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. WeidemanOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Heath v. Johnson, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Akron v. Tomko, Unpublished Decision (11-3-1999)Ohio Court of Appeals · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API