Legal Opinion

State v. Weideman

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2001No. 00-1869PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Portage App. No. 98-P-0109. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed *1447October 10, 2000, at page 2:

“Whether a stop and detention of a motorist by a police officer, who is beyond his or her jurisdictional limits, for an offense observed and committed outside the officer’s jurisdiction automatically constitutes a per se unreasonable seizure under the Fourth Amendment, thereby triggering the mandatory application of the exclusionary rule to suppress all evidence…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FillerOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MittsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. LoganOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Bardes v. ToddOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Natl. City Bank v. Victor Bldg. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ClaryOhio Supreme Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API