Legal Opinion
State v. Weideman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2002No. 2000-1869 & 2000-2126PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 94 Ohio St.3d 501.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. WEIDEMAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Weideman,
2002-Ohio-1484.] Criminal law—Where law enforcement officer, acting outside statutory territorial jurisdiction, stops and detains a motorist for an offense committed and observed outside officer’s jurisdiction, the seizure of the motorist by the officer is not unreasonable per se under the Fourth Amendment—Officer’s statutory violation does not require suppression of all evidence flowing from the stop. (Nos. 00-1869 and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Wyoming v. HoughtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- City of Dayton v. EricksonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Kettering v. HollenOhio Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. ToddOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. AdkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. Black, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. Jones, 2007 Ca 00139 (10-29-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.