Ex Parte Ghahremani
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.
These are post-conviction applications for writs of habeas corpus under Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The applicant alleges that the State knowingly used false testimony at his trial, in violation of his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. We agree with the convicting court’s recommendation to grant relief.
I. Background
A. Factual Background and Trial
The applicant, then 22 years old, began an online relationship with L.S., then 13 years old, in January 2004. The applicant professed his love and sexual desire for L.S., who said that, although she was a virgin, she…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- Ex parte WeinsteinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Ex Parte RobbinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Chavez, Ex Parte AdrianCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- EX PARTE Roberto Gonzalez DE LA CRUZ, ApplicantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Samuel Espinoza Rodriguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.