Ex parte Weinstein
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.
in which MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY and ALCALA, JJ„ joined.
Applicant was convicted of murdering Jerry Glaspie. He filed a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that he was denied due process because (1) the State failed to disclose that its key witness, Nathan Adams, had hallucinations and delusions, and (2) the State presented false testimony when Mr. Adams lied about not having hallucinations and delusions. The habeas judge initially filed findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that we deny relief, but we remanded the case and asked her…
3Cases cited24 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by164 opinions
- EX PARTE Roberto Gonzalez DE LA CRUZ, ApplicantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ex Parte Cresencio Zantos-Cuebas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
- Ex parte BarnabyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Ex parte ChaneyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Ex Parte NavarijoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.