Kaplan v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
The plaintiffs were passengers in a private taxicab owned and operated by one Lomio. The taxicab collided with a pillar supporting an elevated transit railroad overpass on Baychester Avenue in The Bronx, causing certain injuries to the plaintiffs. Suit was .instituted against Lomio, the driver of the cab, and the city, judgment was rendered against both defendants. Lomio did not appeal. The city appealed, and the *321matter was reversed as to it (Kaplan v. City of New York, 6 A D 2d 489), because of the receipt of improper testimony of prior accidents. The court said “ [i] t is not proper,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stern v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Gastel v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Annino v. City of UticaNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Brady v. Manhattan Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Koehler v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maurizio D. Fortunato v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Greenwood v. KovenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Rittenhouse v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Hough v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Vega-Santana v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.