Legal Opinion

Gottfried v. Gottfried

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1950PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalter, J.

Defendants examined by plaintiffs as adverse parties before trial move to suppress their depositions because their request for cross-examination by their own counsel was denied. The denial was by an Official Referee presiding at Special Term; Part II, and a preliminary objection is made that defendants cannot complain, of a ruling they themselves invoked, and, also, that they cannot ask a co-ordinate branch of the court to reverse the Referee.

I think that untenable. 1. Defendants asked for a ruling and their counsel acquiesced in the Referee’s intimation that American Worcestershire Sauce Co.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. The People v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. In re the Estate of GreenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. Sturm v. . Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Gallagher v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. TannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Cusumanu v. Pitzer Trucking Co.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API