Legal Opinion

Kelly, Jr. v. Furlong

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1935No. 30,229PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devaney, Chief J ustice.

This is a suit to disaffirm and to rescind certain transactions had between plaintiff and this defendant during plaintiff’s infancy. Defendant is a stockbroker. Between September 10 and December 27,1929,. plaintiff purchased from or through the defendant 15 shares of stock of a certain corporation for which he paid $>1,207.25 in cash. Between March 12, 1930, and May 20, 1930, plaintiff sold these same shares of stock back to or through defendant for $755.07 cash, thereby sustaining a loss. At all times above mentioned plaintiff was a minor. He arrived at his majority…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Northwestern Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Goodnow v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Rubin v. StrandbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Berglund v. American Multigraph Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Eisenmenger v. MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Worman Motor Co. v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  3. Valencia v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  4. Baltrusch v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Gillespie v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API