Eisenmenger v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Edward Murphy (impleaded with John Murphy, the defendants being sued as partners) from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Brill, J., presiding, denying his motion to set aside the judgment (which was for $244,51) as void as to him.
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This is an appeal by Edward Murphy from an order of the district court refusing to set aside a judgment recovered against *85both of the above-named defendants in September, 1883. The judgment was entered upon default, after a personal service of the summons. This application of the appellant, made more than four years after the entry of the judgment, was based solely upon the fact alleged by him, and supported by other affidavits, that at the time of the entry of the judgment he was under the age of 21 years. It further appeared that he was engaged as a copartner with the other defendant in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Simmons v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
- Abdil v. AbdilIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Barber v. GravesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
- Goodnow v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Blake v. DouglassIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Brunette v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Phelps v. HeatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Muenkel v. MuenkelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Trolinger v. CluffIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.