Worman Motor Co. v. Hill
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.
— The plaintiff Stanley Hill, by his guardian ad litem, commenced this aetion on Septem ber 20, 1937, against the Worman Motor Company to recover the reasonable value of a 1933 used Plymouth Coupe, delivered by him to the defendant as part payment for a 1935 used Ford V-8 Coupe, purchased by plaintiff from defendant on or about November 2,1936, while he was a minor. The consideration recited in the conditional contract of sale for the Ford was the Plymouth and $304.20, to be paid in twelve monthly payments of $25.35 each, beginning with November 30, 1936. In the written contract the trade-in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Schoenung v. GalletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Berglund v. American Multigraph Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Pacheco v. DelgardoArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Whitman v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court · 1981
- Valley National Bank v. HayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Harris v. RaughtonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Perry Auto Co. v. MainlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.