Legal Opinion

Worman Motor Co. v. Hill

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1939No. Civil No. 4083PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

— The plaintiff Stanley Hill, by his guardian ad litem, commenced this aetion on Septem ber 20, 1937, against the Worman Motor Company to recover the reasonable value of a 1933 used Plymouth Coupe, delivered by him to the defendant as part payment for a 1935 used Ford V-8 Coupe, purchased by plaintiff from defendant on or about November 2,1936, while he was a minor. The consideration recited in the conditional contract of sale for the Ford was the Plymouth and $304.20, to be paid in twelve monthly payments of $25.35 each, beginning with November 30, 1936. In the written contract the trade-in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. MacGreal v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Schoenung v. GalletWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Berglund v. American Multigraph Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Pacheco v. DelgardoArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Whitman v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Larry C. Iverson, Inc. v. BoumaMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Valley National Bank v. HayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. Harris v. RaughtonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Perry Auto Co. v. MainlandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API