Legal Opinion
Casey v. Northeast Utilities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 29, 1999No. SC 16009PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the defendant second injury fund (fund), may *367be ordered to pay penalties for failing to make timely payments pursuant to General Statutes § 31-303.1 The fund appeals from a decision of the compensation review board (board) affirming an order issued by a workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) directing the fund to pay a penalty on a certain payment to the plaintiff, Jackie Casey, which the commissioner found to be untimely under § 31-303.2 We affirm the decision of the board.
The facts are not in dispute. On May 18,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Klapproth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Caltabiano v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. MirandaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Potvin v. Lincoln Service & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Schiano v. Bliss Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Miller v. E.M.C. Insurance CompaniesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.