Legal Opinion

Colchester Savings Bank v. Brown

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 11, 1902PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to recover the amount of a promissory note, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New London County and tried to the court, Noyes, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff, and appeal by the defendant for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.

In 1883 A gave his promissory note for the sum of $567 to the plaintiff and to secure the same mortgaged to the plaintiff a tract of land owned by him. After-wards A conveyed said premises to B, and thereupon B to Q, and, later, 0 to the defendant. Each of these conveyances was for a valuable consideration, and by warrantee deed free and clear of all incumbrances except said mortgage, which each successive grantee, by the terms of his deed, expressly assumed and agreed to pay. The plaintiff now sues the defendant, who is the present owner of the premises, to recover the amount due upon said…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Dean v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Thorp v. . the Keokuk Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Heim v. VogelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  5. Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Strong v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Schneider v. FerrignoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. State v. HughesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1965
  4. Arcari v. StrouchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Burke v. RosenthalConnecticut Superior Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API