Arcari v. Strouch
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
This action was brought under General Statutes, § 5489, which permits a mortgagee to maintain an action in his own name against a grantee of the mortgaged premises who, in his deed, assumes and agrees to pay the mortgage encumbrance. Colchester Savings Bank v. Brown, 75 Conn. 69, 71, 52 Atl. 316. The plaintiff, Isabelle Arcari, sued the defendant Fannie Meyers and six others to recover a balance overdue upon a note secured by a third mortgage upon real estate in Hartford, which note the plaintiff alleged the defendants assumed' and agreed to pay in various conveyances of the property to them.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell v. CampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Schley v. . FryerNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Watson v. WellsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
- Corsello v. Emerson Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- New York Life Insurance v. AitkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- McCutcheon v. ShanenConnecticut Superior Court · 1935