Legal Opinion
Schneider v. Ferrigno
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 4, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
This action is brought by the holders of a certain mortgage to recover upon a condition contained in a deed of the mortgaged premises to the defendant wherein he assumed and agreed to pay the mortgage. It was originally executed by Ethel M. Holmes Case to one Paradise, being a fourth mortgage for $15,475 upon certain premises owned by her. Paradise sold the note and mortgage to David Miller and Miller sold them to the plaintiff Baggish and to Samuel Schneider, who took title to his half interest in the name of his wife, the other plaintiff. Before he acquired his interest in the note and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vrooman v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Dean v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Easterbrook v. Hebrew Ladies Orphan SocietySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Byram Lumber & Supply Co. v. PageSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Baurer v. DevenisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Knapp v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Somers v. AvantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Standard Mattress Co. v. City of HartfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1974
- Meriden Savings Bank v. SujdakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Fourth New London NSB Quarters, Inc. v. Wyoming Valley Contractors, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.