Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel Hayden v. Hill
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1947PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, C. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant, Earl H. Hill, from a judgment of the circuit court which removed him from office of member of the State Fish Commission. The latter consists of three commissioners; see § 83-201, O. C. L. A.
This proceeding, which is one of quo warranto (§§8-801 to and including 8-815, O. C. L. A.) was instituted by the state upon the information of the district attorney for Marion County. We shall refer to the state as the plaintiff. The defendant is the aforementioned Earl H. Hill.
The plaintiff contends that when the complaint was filed April 27, 1946, the defendant was a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pruitt v. Glen Rose Independent School District Number OneTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- State ex rel. Biggs v. CorleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
- Saint v. AllenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Gibson v. KayOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Stubbs v. LeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Butera v. LombardiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State Ex Rel. O'Hara v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Cargo v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Cargo v. PaulusOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Nesbitt v. AppleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.